Afghan Wedding Tradition

Marriage in traditional Afghan culture has a deep-rooted process that is gradually rooted. Young men and women rarely have opportunities to meet and usually choose a future couple in a hurry. When a young man wants to marry a young woman from an unknown family, his parents first make some background checks on her trying to learn more about her morality, beauty and other family problems. If they are satisfied with what they find, their parents indirectly or directly understand and send a family related to the woman 's family or her home to disclose the proposal in a favorable situation I will. The story that Khadija and her three brothers got married is an explanation of war and tradition, which is disappointing for Afghans. It included the Afghanistan War in its most violent place, the South Herman Province, the Taliban home base, many of them torn apart by loyalty between government and rebel factions. This is also a story that women in traditional societies are fighting the lack of choice in their lives. In their Pashtun society, brothers believe there is an obligation to make their brothers widow - the widow has no choice but to protect children or their homes. According to past wedding traditions, many couples now choose to incorporate their religious or spiritual devotion into their wedding rings. There are many contemporary designs that will allow you to incorporate these traditions into your ring design. You can integrate cross, Rosario, star of David, scrolls, other spiritual or religious signs in the design of the wedding ring. Do not forget that your wedding ring is not necessarily very traditional. If you want traditional things, please use the regular diamond engagement ring and wedding ring set. But even if you remember the old wedding tradition, there are other types of wedding rings on the market if you want something unique to complement your style and flare.

Indian Art Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Indian Art - Essay Example This artwork is in the form of a stone sculpture have dimensions of 26 x 34.9 cm (10.25 x 13.75 in.) done on schist material. The sculpture depicts a Hercules holding a lion’s skin and learning on a stick, while looking back at an approaching Nemean lion. The wresting scene is what connects this sculpture to the Greco-Roman period where man used to fight with animals such as lions in a big arena and, if they triumphed over the lion, would then be crowned as a hero.2 Also, Greco-Roman art has a theme of depicting people fighting and the only difference with this sculpture is that Greco-Roman art focused mainly on men fighting not men with animals. Some of the earliest schist or stone sculptures can be traced back to Indians. Others argue that they are the ones who started curving stones to produce art. Thus, this sculpture can be traced back to the Indians.3 Also, worshipping of idols was also widespread among Indians as it still today. Such a sculpture depicting a Hercules as a hero is a form of idol worship in the eyes of any critics can be considered as idol because people are praising him through an object. This sculpture, according to Behrendt, is part of a set of 21 panels, which inflated the stairway of a stupa, most probably on the western part of the Swat valley. 4 The treatment of the structure of these athletic men is fascinating in terms of both the schematization and naturalism of the musculature relating to the men of the Greco-Roman era. The oars that they have and the acanthus foliage that appear to nurture out of their bodies propose that they are marine deities like those of the Greco-Roman age. 5 The sculpture is done on Serpentinite and its dimensions are H. 16.8 cm (6 5/8 in.) and 43.2 cm (W. 17 in.). On an Indian art, holding a sword symbolized eradication of vices, like this men in the sculpture look as if they are from a fight and they have triumphed

UN- Nato involvement in Bosnia Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

UN- Nato involvement in Bosnia - Essay Example The initial step in that direction happened in 1989 when Serbia overturned Kosovos independence by sending their troops. After Milosevic was elected president of Serbia in 1989, Serbia tried to impose its authority on the rest of the country. As a counter reaction, Slovenia and Croatia seceded and declared their independence in 1991. Fighting immediately broke out with the Serbian forces moving into Slovenia. Although, European Community (EC) delegation negotiated a ceasefire, with Serbian forces withdrawing from Slovenia, it did not last for long. Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina also declared its independence, thus completing the disintegration of Yugoslavia. However the Serbian forces led by Milosevic captured 65% of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s territory, proclaiming it as the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina although, it comprised of just 30% of the population. The Croats for their part also seized a sizable portion of Bosnia, leaving the majority Muslim population only minor territory, including the capital Sarajevo. To seize the Muslim territories as well, the Serbian forces launched armed assault against the poorly armed Muslim and indulged in ethnic cleansing. With this conflict accentuating further, UN in association with NATO entered the scenario. â€Å"UN entered the Yugoslav crisis as late as in September 1991 when the UN Security Council adopted resolution No.713 imposing arms embargo on all territory of Yugoslavia† (CEEISA). At the outset itself, UN’s arms embargo did not provide the desired peace. Although UN was able to impose arms embargo on the sea, it could do it on the land, thus giving free hand to the already armed Serbian forces. While the Croatian and the Bosnian forces only had minimum light weaponry and lacked heavy weapons, tanks and aircraft which explained the Serb superiority in battlefield. (CEEISA). The next step UN took was the formation of United Nations